NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000M and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 500 MHz
• Around 71% higher pipelines: 192 vs 112
• Around 51% better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 280 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 778 vs 454
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 233 vs 89

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX

• Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 28 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	778 454
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	233 89

Compare specifications (specs)