NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro 2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
2.2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 55 Watt

Launch date	29 September 2011 vs 13 January 2011
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 55 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Around 5% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 523 MHz
4.2x more texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 4.18 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 192 vs 48
4.2x better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 100.42 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 233 vs 169
3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 778 vs 255
4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3414 vs 758
Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1926 vs 1254
Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1926 vs 1254
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2569 vs 1723
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2569 vs 1723

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	550 MHz vs 523 MHz
Texture fill rate	17.6 GTexel / s vs 4.18 GTexel / s
Pipelines	192 vs 48
Floating-point performance	422.4 gflops vs 100.42 gflops
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 1796 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	233 vs 169
PassMark - G3D Mark	778 vs 255
Geekbench - OpenCL	3414 vs 758
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1926 vs 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1926 vs 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2569 vs 1723
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2569 vs 1723

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

169

233

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

255

778

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

758

3414

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1254

1926

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1254

1926

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1723

2569

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1723

2569

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM	NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
PassMark - G2D Mark	169	233
PassMark - G3D Mark	255	778
Geekbench - OpenCL	758	3414
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1254	1926
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1254	1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1723	2569
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1723	2569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		8.306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		272.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.855
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		14.423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		27.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		1261

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM	NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Fermi
Code name	GF119	GF106
Launch date	29 September 2011	13 January 2011
Place in performance rating	1346	1349
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$46.56
Price now		$46.56
Value for money (0-100)		25.92
Technical info
Core clock speed	523 MHz	550 MHz
Floating-point performance	100.42 gflops	422.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	48	192
Texture fill rate	4.18 GTexel / s	17.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count	292 million	1,170 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	145 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.37 GB / s	28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1796 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory		0