NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M and NVIDIA Quadro 2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 550 MHz
• Around 83% higher texture fill rate: 32.2 billion / sec vs 17.6 GTexel / s
• Around 75% higher pipelines: 336 vs 192
• Around 83% better floating-point performance: 772.8 gflops vs 422.4 gflops
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1864 vs 778
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 358 vs 233
• Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5696 vs 3414
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 vs 8.306
• Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 533.677 vs 272.707
• Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.681 vs 0.855
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.229 vs 14.423
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.187 vs 27.158

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

• Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1261 vs 296
• 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1926 vs 475
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2569 vs 657
• 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1261 vs 296
• 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1926 vs 475
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2569 vs 657

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1864 778
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	358 233
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5696 3414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.911 8.306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	533.677 272.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.681 0.855
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.229 14.423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	66.187 27.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	296 1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	475 1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	657 2569
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	296 1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	475 1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	657 2569

Compare specifications (specs)