NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M and NVIDIA Quadro 2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • Around 5% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 550 MHz
  • Around 83% higher texture fill rate: 32.2 billion / sec vs 17.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 75% higher pipelines: 336 vs 192
  • Around 83% better floating-point performance: 772.8 gflops vs 422.4 gflops
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1864 vs 778
  • Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 358 vs 233
  • Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5696 vs 3411
  • Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 vs 8.306
  • Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 533.677 vs 272.707
  • Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.681 vs 0.855
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.229 vs 14.423
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.187 vs 27.158
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 28 June 2011 vs 13 January 2011
Core clock speed 575 MHz vs 550 MHz
Texture fill rate 32.2 billion / sec vs 17.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 336 vs 192
Floating-point performance 772.8 gflops vs 422.4 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1864 vs 778
PassMark - G2D Mark 358 vs 233
Geekbench - OpenCL 5696 vs 3411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.911 vs 8.306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 533.677 vs 272.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.681 vs 0.855
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 31.229 vs 14.423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 66.187 vs 27.158

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

  • Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
  • Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1500 MHz
  • 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1261 vs 296
  • 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1926 vs 475
  • 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2569 vs 657
  • 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1261 vs 296
  • 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1926 vs 475
  • 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2569 vs 657
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1536 MB
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1261 vs 296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1926 vs 475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2569 vs 657
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1261 vs 296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1926 vs 475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2569 vs 657

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1864
778
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
358
233
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5696
3411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14.911
8.306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
533.677
272.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.681
0.855
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
31.229
14.423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
66.187
27.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
296
1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
475
1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
657
2569
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
296
1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
475
1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
657
2569
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1864 778
PassMark - G2D Mark 358 233
Geekbench - OpenCL 5696 3411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.911 8.306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 533.677 272.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.681 0.855
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 31.229 14.423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 66.187 27.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 296 1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 475 1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 657 2569
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 296 1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 475 1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 657 2569

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Essentials

Architecture Fermi 2.0 Fermi
Code name GF114 GF106
Launch date 28 June 2011 13 January 2011
Place in performance rating 1349 1352
Type Laptop Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $46.56
Price now $46.56
Value for money (0-100) 25.92

Technical info

Core clock speed 575 MHz 550 MHz
CUDA cores 336
Floating-point performance 772.8 gflops 422.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 336 192
Texture fill rate 32.2 billion / sec 17.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 55 Watt
Transistor count 1,950 million 1,170 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Interface MXM-B (3.0) MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size large medium sized
SLI options 2-way
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 API 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 72.0 GB / s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 192 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus
SLI