NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000M and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 10% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 500 MHz
2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
Around 76% better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 240 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 65 Watt
4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 778 vs 381
2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 233 vs 81

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 January 2011 vs 29 July 2008
Core clock speed	550 MHz vs 500 MHz
Pipelines	192 vs 96
Floating-point performance	422.4 gflops vs 240 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 65 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	778 vs 381
PassMark - G2D Mark	233 vs 81

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT

Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 24 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3237 vs 2569
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3237 vs 2569

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	24 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3237 vs 2569
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3237 vs 2569

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

778

381

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

233

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2569

3237

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2569

3237

Name	NVIDIA Quadro 2000M	NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
PassMark - G3D Mark	778	381
PassMark - G2D Mark	233	81
Geekbench - OpenCL	3414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	272.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.855
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	14.423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	27.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2569	3237
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2569	3237

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro 2000M	NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi	Tesla
Code name	GF106	G92
Launch date	13 January 2011	29 July 2008
Launch price (MSRP)	$46.56
Place in performance rating	1343	1345
Price now	$46.56
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	25.92
Technical info
Core clock speed	550 MHz	500 MHz
Floating-point performance	422.4 gflops	240 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	192	96
Texture fill rate	17.6 GTexel / s	24 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	65 Watt
Transistor count	1,170 million	754 million
CUDA cores		96
Gigaflops		360
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized	large
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB / s	51.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR3
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
CUDA
PureVideo HD