NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2053 vs 1926
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3275 vs 2569
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2053 vs 1926
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3275 vs 2569
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2053 vs 1926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 vs 2569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 vs 1926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 vs 2569 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 13.0 billion / sec
- 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
- Around 36% better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 311.04 gflops
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 778 vs 771
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 233 vs 226
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3411 vs 2620
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.306 vs 6.139
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 272.707 vs 171.053
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.855 vs 0.65
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.423 vs 9.729
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.158 vs 19.871
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1261 vs 1208
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1261 vs 1208
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 13.0 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 192 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops vs 311.04 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 778 vs 771 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 233 vs 226 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3411 vs 2620 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.306 vs 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 272.707 vs 171.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.855 vs 0.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.423 vs 9.729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.158 vs 19.871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1261 vs 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1261 vs 1208 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 771 | 778 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 | 233 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2620 | 3411 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.139 | 8.306 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.053 | 272.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.65 | 0.855 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.729 | 14.423 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.871 | 27.158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1208 | 1261 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2053 | 1926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 | 2569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1208 | 1261 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 | 1926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 | 2569 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | GF108 | GF106 |
Launch date | 1 February 2011 | 13 January 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | $46.56 |
Place in performance rating | 1351 | 1352 |
Price now | $69.99 | $46.56 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.03 | 25.92 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 550 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 311.04 gflops | 422.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 13.0 billion / sec | 17.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,170 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Standard memory config per GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA |