NVIDIA Tesla M2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2070 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Tesla M2070

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
Around 4% higher core clock speed: 574 MHz vs 550 MHz
Around 83% higher texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
2.3x more pipelines: 448 vs 192
2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 422.4 gflops
3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
Around 74% higher memory clock speed: 3132 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.145 vs 8.306
3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 910.236 vs 272.707
Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.005 vs 0.855
3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.235 vs 14.423
3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.442 vs 27.158

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	25 July 2011 vs 13 January 2011
Core clock speed	574 MHz vs 550 MHz
Texture fill rate	32.2 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	448 vs 192
Floating-point performance	1,030.4 gflops vs 422.4 gflops
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	3132 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	12.145 vs 8.306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	910.236 vs 272.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.005 vs 0.855
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	46.235 vs 14.423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	94.442 vs 27.158

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

4.1x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 225 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 225 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2070
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.145

8.306

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

910.236

272.707

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.005

0.855

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

46.235

14.423

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

94.442

27.158

Name	NVIDIA Tesla M2070	NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	12.145	8.306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	910.236	272.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.005	0.855
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	46.235	14.423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	94.442	27.158
PassMark - G3D Mark		778
PassMark - G2D Mark		233
Geekbench - OpenCL		3414
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		2569
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		2569

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Tesla M2070	NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi	Fermi
Code name	GF100	GF106
Launch date	25 July 2011	13 January 2011
Launch price (MSRP)	$3,099	$46.56
Place in performance rating	1336	1338
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Price now		$46.56
Value for money (0-100)		25.92
Technical info
Core clock speed	574 MHz	550 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,030.4 gflops	422.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	448	192
Texture fill rate	32.2 GTexel / s	17.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count	3,100 million	1,170 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	248 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	150.3 GB / s	28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3132 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Shared memory		0