NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 410 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 410
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 11.3 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 192 vs 16
- 6.9x better floating-point performance: 271.1 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 438 vs 126
- 7.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 30
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1311 vs 497
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1794 vs 688
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1311 vs 497
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1794 vs 688
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 August 2012 vs 12 October 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 11.3 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 271.1 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 438 vs 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 vs 30 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1311 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1794 vs 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1311 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1794 vs 688 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Around 99% higher core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 706 MHz
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 30.5 Watt vs 38 Watt
- Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2438 vs 1446
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1402 MHz vs 706 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30.5 Watt vs 38 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2438 vs 1446 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 410
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro 410 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 438 | 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 30 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1446 | 2438 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.393 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 126.006 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.685 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.847 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 919 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1311 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1794 | 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 919 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1311 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1794 | 688 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro 410 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | GT218 |
| Launch date | 7 August 2012 | 12 October 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $29.49 |
| Place in performance rating | 1468 | 1674 |
| Price now | $272.28 | $32.99 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.70 | 6.81 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 1402 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 271.1 gflops | 39.36 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 11.3 GTexel / s | 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 38 Watt | 30.5 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 260 million |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 176 mm | 6.60" (16.8 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.731" (6.9 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.26 GB / s | 8.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro 410 with others
NVIDIAQuadro 410 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 600
NVIDIAQuadro 410 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6530D IGP
NVIDIAQuadro 410 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6370D IGP
NVIDIAQuadro 410 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K420
NVIDIAQuadro 410 vs
IntelHD Graphics 5300
NVIDIAQuadro 410 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M335DX
