NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 5000M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 7.4x more texture fill rate: 16.2 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- 14x more maximum memory size: 1792 MB vs 128 MB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 810 MHz
- 24x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2060 vs 86
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 426 vs 378
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 July 2010 vs 20 April 2006 |
Texture fill rate | 16.2 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1792 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2060 vs 86 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 vs 378 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 405 MHz
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 21 Watt vs 100 Watt
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 405 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 21 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 5000M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 350 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2060 | 86 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 | 378 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23008 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5249 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5249 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7205 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7205 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 5000M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Curie |
Code name | GF100 | G72 |
Launch date | 27 July 2010 | 20 April 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 419 | 422 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 405 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | |
Texture fill rate | 16.2 GTexel / s | 2.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 21 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 112 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | 6.48 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 810 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
ECC (Error Correcting Code) |