NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 78 Watt
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 135 vs 91
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 October 2008 vs 8 January 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 78 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 135 vs 91 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 28 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 3.5x more pipelines: 112 vs 32
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 280 gflops vs 99.2 gflops
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 378 vs 173
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3285 vs 2337
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3285 vs 2337
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 112 vs 32 |
| Floating-point performance | 280 gflops vs 99.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 378 vs 173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3285 vs 2337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3285 vs 2337 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 173 | 378 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 135 | 91 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2337 | 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2337 | 3285 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G96 | G92 |
| Launch date | 1 October 2008 | 8 January 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1296 | 1298 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | |
| Price now | $99.02 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.26 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 99.2 gflops | 280 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 112 |
| Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s | 28 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 78 Watt |
| Transistor count | 314 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
| PureVideo HD | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M with others
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1700M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2400
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1700M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3700
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1700M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3700M
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1700M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4800
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1700M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 285M
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1700M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 615
