NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 135 vs 88
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 October 2008 vs 14 August 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 135 vs 88 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 35.2 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 128 vs 32
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 352.0 gflops vs 99.2 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 456 vs 173
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3315 vs 2337
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3315 vs 2337
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 128 vs 32 |
| Floating-point performance | 352.0 gflops vs 99.2 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 456 vs 173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3315 vs 2337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3315 vs 2337 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 173 | 456 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 135 | 88 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2337 | 3315 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2337 | 3315 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G96 | G92 |
| Launch date | 1 October 2008 | 14 August 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1296 | 1297 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $925 | |
| Price now | $925 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.12 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 99.2 gflops | 352.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 128 |
| Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s | 35.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 314 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-II | MXM-HE |
| Laptop size | large | large |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
| PureVideo HD | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M with others
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1700M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2400
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1700M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3700
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1700M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3700M
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1700M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4800
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1700M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 285M
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1700M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 615
