NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 57% higher texture fill rate: 15.68 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 384 vs 32
- 7.6x better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 99.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1802 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 798 vs 173
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 149 vs 135
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 2337
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 2337
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 vs 1 October 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 32 |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops vs 99.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 798 vs 173 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 vs 135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 2337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 2337 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 798 | 173 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | 135 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3874 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.479 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.864 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.101 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1589 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 2337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1589 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 2337 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK107 | G96 |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 | 1 October 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1303 | 1306 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 99.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 32 |
| Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| HDCP | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-II |
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
| PureVideo HD | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1700M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 4000M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7660G IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K610M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920M
