NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 39% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 450 MHz
• 5.6x more texture fill rate: 10 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
• 2.8x better floating-point performance: 99.2 gflops vs 36 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
• 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 173 vs 90
• 7.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2337 vs 328
• 7.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2337 vs 328

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 40 vs 32
• Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 135

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	173 90
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	135 212
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2337 328
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2337 328

Compare specifications (specs)