NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3259 vs 1876
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3259 vs 1876
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 December 2009 vs 3 March 2009 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3259 vs 1876 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3259 vs 1876 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1463 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 38 billion / sec vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 128 vs 96
- Around 30% better floating-point performance: 374.5 gflops vs 288 gflops
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 576 vs 415
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 153 vs 43
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1463 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 374.5 gflops vs 288 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 576 vs 415 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 153 vs 43 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 415 | 576 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 43 | 153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1963 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1963 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3259 | 1876 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3259 | 1876 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92 | G92 |
Launch date | 1 December 2009 | 3 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1262 | 1263 |
Price now | $49.95 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.55 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1463 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 288 gflops | 374.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 38 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Gigaflops | 562 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-IV |
Laptop size | large | large |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 61 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD | ||
SLI |