AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 65 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 112 vs 43
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3259
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3259
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2012 vs 1 December 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 112 vs 43 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3259 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3259 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 360 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 415 vs 364
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1963 vs 1810
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1963 vs 1810
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 360 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 415 vs 364 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1963 vs 1810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1963 vs 1810 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 364 | 415 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 112 | 43 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1232 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1810 | 1963 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1810 | 1963 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3259 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3259 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Tesla |
Code name | Devastator | G92 |
Launch date | 15 May 2012 | 1 December 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1259 | 1262 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Price now | $49.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.55 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 497 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 360 MHz | 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,303 million | 754 million |
Floating-point performance | 288 gflops | |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 |