NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs ATI Radeon HD 3200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M and ATI Radeon HD 3200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2.4x more pipelines: 96 vs 40
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 418 vs 82
- 8.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3259 vs 386
- 8.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3259 vs 386
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 December 2009 vs 4 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 40 |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 418 vs 82 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3259 vs 386 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3259 vs 386 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3200
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 5.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 227 vs 44
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 227 vs 44 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M | ATI Radeon HD 3200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 418 | 82 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 44 | 227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1963 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1963 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3259 | 386 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3259 | 386 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M | ATI Radeon HD 3200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | RV6xx |
Code name | G92 | RS780M |
Launch date | 1 December 2009 | 4 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1262 | 1264 |
Price now | $49.95 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.55 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 288 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 181 Million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | yes |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
HDCP support | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |