NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and ATI Mobility FireGL V5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 5.7x more texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 96 vs 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 110 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 128 MB
- Around 88% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 467 vs 82
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 365 vs 223
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 February 2008 vs 3 February 2005 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 8 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 110 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 467 vs 82 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 365 vs 223 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility FireGL V5000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M | ATI Mobility FireGL V5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 467 | 82 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 365 | 223 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1820 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1820 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M | ATI Mobility FireGL V5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | R400 |
| Code name | G92 | M26 |
| Launch date | 23 February 2008 | 3 February 2005 |
| Place in performance rating | 813 | 816 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 160 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 110 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 8 |
| Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s | 2.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 120 million |
| Boost clock speed | 350 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-HE | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.1 GB / s | 13.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 350 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | 128 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Gigathread technology | ||
| HDCP-capable | ||
| HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
| PCIe | ||
