NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 65% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 5.3x more texture fill rate: 85.25 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
• 12x more pipelines: 1152 vs 96
• 12.8x better floating-point performance: 2,046 gflops vs 160 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
• 3x more maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 512 MB
• 3.5x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 1820
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 1820

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

• Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 130 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3325 1820
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3325 1820

Compare specifications (specs)