NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 96% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 3.9x more texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 16 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 768 vs 96
- 9.9x better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 160 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 7.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 vs 467
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 365
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3242 vs 1820
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3242 vs 1820
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 March 2013 vs 23 February 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec vs 16 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops vs 160 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3388 vs 467 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 vs 365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 vs 1820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 vs 1820 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
- Around 91% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 134 Watt
- 266.7x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 134 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3388 | 467 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 | 365 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9482 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 | 1820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 | 1820 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK106 | G92 |
| Launch date | 26 March 2013 | 23 February 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
| Place in performance rating | 810 | 813 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 500 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops | 160 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec | 16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 51.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| Gigathread technology | ||
| HDCP-capable | ||
| HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon HD 6870
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDFirePro M4100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM
