NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 22% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 450 MHz
  • 19.6x more texture fill rate: 35.2 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
  • 3.2x more pipelines: 128 vs 40
  • 9.8x better floating-point performance: 352.0 gflops vs 36 gflops
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
  • 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 456 vs 90
  • 10.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3315 vs 328
  • 10.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3315 vs 328
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 14 August 2008 vs 14 May 2007
Core clock speed 550 MHz vs 450 MHz
Texture fill rate 35.2 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 128 vs 40
Floating-point performance 352.0 gflops vs 36 gflops
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 456 vs 90
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3315 vs 328
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3315 vs 328

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 88
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 212 vs 88

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
456
90
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
88
212
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3315
328
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3315
328
Name NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
PassMark - G3D Mark 456 90
PassMark - G2D Mark 88 212
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3315 328
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3315 328

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

Essentials

Architecture Tesla TeraScale
Code name G92 M72
Launch date 14 August 2008 14 May 2007
Launch price (MSRP) $925
Place in performance rating 1303 1306
Price now $925
Type Mobile workstation Laptop
Value for money (0-100) 1.12

Technical info

Core clock speed 550 MHz 450 MHz
Floating-point performance 352.0 gflops 36 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 128 40
Texture fill rate 35.2 GTexel / s 1.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt
Transistor count 754 million 180 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-HE PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 10.0 10.0
OpenGL 3.3 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Memory bandwidth 51.2 GB / s 6.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 800 MHz
Memory type GDDR3 DDR2, GDDR3
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

CUDA
PowerMizer 8.0
PowerPlay 7.0