NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 19.6x more texture fill rate: 35.2 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 128 vs 40
- 9.8x better floating-point performance: 352.0 gflops vs 36 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 456 vs 90
- 10.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3315 vs 328
- 10.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3315 vs 328
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 vs 14 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 352.0 gflops vs 36 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 456 vs 90 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3315 vs 328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3315 vs 328 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 88
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 vs 88 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 456 | 90 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 88 | 212 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3315 | 328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3315 | 328 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
Code name | G92 | M72 |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 | 14 May 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $925 | |
Place in performance rating | 1305 | 1308 |
Price now | $925 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.12 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 352.0 gflops | 36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s | 1.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-HE | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
PowerPlay 7.0 |