NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M and NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 29 Watt
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 334 vs 328
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2008 vs 13 March 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 29 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 334 vs 328 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 4.5x more texture fill rate: 10 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 32 vs 8
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 80 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 270 vs 93
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 32 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops vs 22.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 270 vs 93 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 93 | 270 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 334 | 328 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G98 | G84 |
Launch date | 15 August 2008 | 13 March 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 486 | 487 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 22.4 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 2.2 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 29 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 289 million |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | GDDR2?, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |