AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

AMD Radeon Pro 575

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 99% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 550 MHz
64x more texture fill rate: 140.8 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
256x more pipelines: 2048 vs 8
201.2x better floating-point performance: 4,506 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
5.7x more memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 1200 MHz

Launch date	5 June 2017 vs 15 August 2008
Core clock speed	1096 MHz vs 550 MHz
Texture fill rate	140.8 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2048 vs 8
Floating-point performance	4,506 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	6800 MHz vs 1200 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

6x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 120 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	20 Watt vs 120 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 575	NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
Geekbench - OpenCL	34778
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	86.154
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1090.128
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	7.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	98.349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	539.686
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9613
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2814
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9613
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2814
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352
PassMark - G3D Mark		93
PassMark - G2D Mark		334

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 575	NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Tesla
Code name	Polaris 20	G98
Launch date	5 June 2017	15 August 2008
Place in performance rating	485	488
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Core clock speed	1096 MHz	550 MHz
Floating-point performance	4,506 gflops	22.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	2048	8
Texture fill rate	140.8 GTexel / s	2.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	120 Watt	20 Watt
Transistor count	5,700 million	210 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-II
Length	241 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	217.6 GB / s	9.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	6800 MHz	1200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR2, GDDR3
Shared memory		0