NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
  • 9.9x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 197 Watt
  • Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Launch date 15 August 2008 vs 18 March 2008
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt vs 197 Watt
Memory clock speed 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

  • 2.7x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 550 MHz
  • 34.9x more texture fill rate: 76.8 billion / sec vs 2.2 GTexel / s
  • 32x more pipelines: 2x 128 vs 8
  • 34.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 384.0 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 512 MB vs 256 MB
  • 8.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 798 vs 93
  • Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 518 vs 334
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1500 MHz vs 550 MHz
Texture fill rate 76.8 billion / sec vs 2.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2x 128 vs 8
Floating-point performance 2x 384.0 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
Maximum memory size 2x 512 MB vs 256 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 798 vs 93
PassMark - G2D Mark 518 vs 334

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
93
798
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
334
518
Name NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
PassMark - G3D Mark 93 798
PassMark - G2D Mark 334 518
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3238
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3238

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

Essentials

Architecture Tesla Tesla
Code name G98 G92
Launch date 15 August 2008 18 March 2008
Place in performance rating 485 488
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $599

Technical info

Core clock speed 550 MHz 1500 MHz
Floating-point performance 22.4 gflops 2x 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 8 2x 128
Texture fill rate 2.2 GTexel / s 76.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt 197 Watt
Transistor count 210 million 754 million
CUDA cores 256 (128 per GPU)
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, HDMIDual Link DVI
Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-II PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)
SLI options Quad
Supplementary power connectors 6-pin & 8-pin

API support

DirectX 10.0 10.0
OpenGL 3.3 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2x 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 9.6 GB / s 128 (64 per GPU)
Memory bus width 64 Bit 512 Bit
Memory clock speed 1200 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory type GDDR2, GDDR3 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
CUDA
SLI