NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 64% higher texture fill rate: 43.2 GTexel / s vs 26.4 billion / sec
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 128 vs 96
• Around 60% better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 264 gflops
• Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 105 Watt
• 2.7x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 384 MB
• 2.5x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 586 vs 328
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3272 vs 2160
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3272 vs 2160

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

• 2x more core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 675 MHz
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 97 vs 46

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	586 328
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	46 97
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3272 2160
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3272 2160

Compare specifications (specs)