NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 64% higher texture fill rate: 43.2 GTexel / s vs 26.4 billion / sec
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 128 vs 96
- Around 60% better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 264 gflops
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 384 MB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 581 vs 328
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3272 vs 2160
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3272 vs 2160
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 vs 28 April 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 GTexel / s vs 26.4 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 128 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops vs 264 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 105 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 384 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 581 vs 328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3272 vs 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3272 vs 2160 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
- 2x more core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 675 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 97 vs 44
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1375 MHz vs 675 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 97 vs 44 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 581 | 328 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 44 | 97 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3272 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3272 | 2160 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92 | G92 |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 | 28 April 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1406 | 1408 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $49.99 | |
Price now | $49.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 1375 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | 264 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 GTexel / s | 26.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 105 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 384 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 |