NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 43.2 GTexel / s vs 36.9 billion / sec
- Around 82% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 182 Watt
- Around 14% higher maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 896 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 999 MHz
Launch date | 14 August 2008 vs 16 June 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 GTexel / s vs 36.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 182 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 896 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 999 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
- Around 84% higher core clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 675 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 192 vs 128
- Around 13% better floating-point performance: 476.9 gflops vs 422.4 gflops
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1215 vs 581
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 56 vs 44
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 vs 3272
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 vs 3272
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 675 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 476.9 gflops vs 422.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1215 vs 581 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 56 vs 44 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 vs 3272 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 vs 3272 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 581 | 1215 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 44 | 56 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3272 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3272 | 3342 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19512 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.664 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 477.327 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.906 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.525 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | G92 | GT200 |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 | 16 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1406 | 1407 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Price now | $95.38 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | 476.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 GTexel / s | 36.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 182 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 1,400 million |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 896 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 111.9 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 448 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
3D Vision | ||
SLI |