NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M and NVIDIA GeForce 8300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- 5.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 575 vs 102
- 9.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3272 vs 329
- 9.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3272 vs 329
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 vs 17 April 2007 |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 575 vs 102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3272 vs 329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3272 vs 329 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8300
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 168 vs 42
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 168 vs 42 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8300
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M | NVIDIA GeForce 8300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 575 | 102 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 42 | 168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3272 | 329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3272 | 329 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M | NVIDIA GeForce 8300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92 | C78 |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 | 17 April 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1423 | 1425 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Price now | $22.68 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.26 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCI |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 |