NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M and NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
• Around 45% better floating-point performance: 116.16 gflops vs 80 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 231 vs 124
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1814 vs 1701
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1814 vs 1701

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT

• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 550 MHz
• Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 10 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
• Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1580 MHz
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 57 vs 53

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	231 124
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	53 57
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1814 1701
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1814 1701

Compare specifications (specs)