NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs Intel HD Graphics 4600

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1200 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K1200

Intel HD Graphics 4600

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
2.6x more core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 400 MHz
7.2x more texture fill rate: 35.97 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
25.6x more pipelines: 512 vs 20
23x better floating-point performance: 1,151 gflops vs 50 gflops
4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2952 vs 630
Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 578 vs 314
2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8820 vs 3210
3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.949 vs 8.844
2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 466.139 vs 171.17
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.629 vs 1.115
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.411 vs 10.385
9.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 117.722 vs 12.361
4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4080 vs 988
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1721 vs 1702
Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3288 vs 2808
4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4080 vs 988
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1721 vs 1702
Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3288 vs 2808

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	28 January 2015 vs 3 June 2013
Core clock speed	1058 MHz vs 400 MHz
Texture fill rate	35.97 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 20
Floating-point performance	1,151 gflops vs 50 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2952 vs 630
PassMark - G2D Mark	578 vs 314
Geekbench - OpenCL	8820 vs 3210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	31.949 vs 8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	466.139 vs 171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.629 vs 1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	25.411 vs 10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	117.722 vs 12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4080 vs 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1721 vs 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3288 vs 2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4080 vs 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1721 vs 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3288 vs 2808

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1124 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm

Boost clock speed	1250 MHz vs 1124 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 28 nm

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2952

630

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

578

314

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8820

3210

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31.949

8.844

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

466.139

171.17

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.629

1.115

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

25.411

10.385

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

117.722

12.361

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4080

988

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1721

1702

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3288

2808

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4080

988

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1721

1702

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3288

2808

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K1200	Intel HD Graphics 4600
PassMark - G3D Mark	2952	630
PassMark - G2D Mark	578	314
Geekbench - OpenCL	8820	3210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	31.949	8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	466.139	171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.629	1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	25.411	10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	117.722	12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4080	988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1721	1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3288	2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4080	988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1721	1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3288	2808
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		194

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K1200	Intel HD Graphics 4600
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Generation 7.5
Code name	GM107	Haswell GT2
Launch date	28 January 2015	3 June 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$321.97
Place in performance rating	798	1359
Price now	$289.99
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	13.00
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	1250 MHz
Core clock speed	1058 MHz	400 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,151 gflops	50 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	512	20
Texture fill rate	35.97 GTexel / s	5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	392 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP	No outputs
Number of simultaneous displays	4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	160 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Width	1" (2.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.3
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory type	128 Bit
Shared memory		1
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management
Quick Sync