NVIDIA Quadro K1200 versus Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K1200 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K1200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- 2.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 35.97 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s
- 25.6x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 20
- 23x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,151 gflops versus 50 gflops
- 4.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2952 versus 630
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 578 versus 314
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8820 versus 3210
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.949 versus 8.844
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 466.139 versus 171.17
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.629 versus 1.115
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.411 versus 10.385
- 9.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 117.722 versus 12.361
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4080 versus 988
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1721 versus 1702
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3288 versus 2808
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4080 versus 988
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1721 versus 1702
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3288 versus 2808
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 January 2015 versus 3 June 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 400 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 35.97 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 20 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,151 gflops versus 50 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2952 versus 630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 versus 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8820 versus 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.949 versus 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 466.139 versus 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.629 versus 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.411 versus 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.722 versus 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4080 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1721 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3288 versus 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4080 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1721 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3288 versus 2808 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 1124 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 1124 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2952 | 630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 | 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8820 | 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.949 | 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 466.139 | 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.629 | 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.411 | 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.722 | 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4080 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1721 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3288 | 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4080 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1721 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3288 | 2808 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 7.5 |
| Nom de code | GM107 | Haswell GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 28 January 2015 | 3 June 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $321.97 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 798 | 1359 |
| Prix maintenant | $289.99 | |
| Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,151 gflops | 50 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 20 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 35.97 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 392 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP | No outputs |
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 160 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
| Quick Sync | ||

