NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
Around 12% better floating-point performance: 732.7 gflops vs 652.8 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1580 vs 1204
Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 384 vs 235
Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4071 vs 3793
Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.332 vs 9.947
Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.093 vs 0.982
Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 38.219 vs 23.111
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2446 vs 2283
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1974 vs 1913
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2446 vs 2283
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1974 vs 1913

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 March 2013 vs 22 March 2012
Floating-point performance	732.7 gflops vs 652.8 gflops
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1580 vs 1204
PassMark - G2D Mark	384 vs 235
Geekbench - OpenCL	4071 vs 3793
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.332 vs 9.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.093 vs 0.982
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	38.219 vs 23.111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2446 vs 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1974 vs 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2446 vs 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1974 vs 1913

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 51 Watt
Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 340.824 vs 265.424
Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.773 vs 15.009
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3299 vs 1631
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3299 vs 1631

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt vs 51 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	340.824 vs 265.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	18.773 vs 15.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3299 vs 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3299 vs 1631

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1580

1204

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

384

235

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4071

3793

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14.332

9.947

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

265.424

340.824

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.093

0.982

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15.009

18.773

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

38.219

23.111

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2446

2283

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1631

3299

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1974

1913

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2446

2283

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1631

3299

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1974

1913

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K2000	NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1580	1204
PassMark - G2D Mark	384	235
Geekbench - OpenCL	4071	3793
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.332	9.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	265.424	340.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.093	0.982
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.009	18.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	38.219	23.111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2446	2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1631	3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1974	1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2446	2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1631	3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1974	1913
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	414

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K2000	NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	GK107
Launch date	1 March 2013	22 March 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$599
Place in performance rating	1212	1215
Price now	$164.99
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	11.74
Technical info
Core clock speed	954 MHz
Floating-point performance	732.7 gflops	652.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	384
Texture fill rate	30.53 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	51 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,270 million
Boost clock speed		950 MHz
CUDA cores		384
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	202 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	64 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3\GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus