NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce2 MX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and NVIDIA GeForce2 MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 5.5x more core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 175 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 180 nm
- 64x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 32 MB
- 24.1x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 166 MHz
- 526x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1578 vs 3
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 143
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 28 June 2000 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 175 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 180 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 32 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 166 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1578 vs 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 vs 143 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce2 MX
- 22.9x more texture fill rate: 700 MTexel / s vs 30.53 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 700 MTexel / s vs 30.53 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce2 MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2000 | NVIDIA GeForce2 MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1578 | 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 | 143 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.332 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 265.424 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.093 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.009 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.219 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2446 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1631 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1974 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2446 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1631 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1974 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 | NVIDIA GeForce2 MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Celsius |
Code name | GK107 | NV11 A2 |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 28 June 2000 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Place in performance rating | 1206 | 1180 |
Price now | $164.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 175 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 732.7 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 180 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 GTexel / s | 700 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 20 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
Length | 202 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 7.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 32 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 2.656 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 166 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | SDR |