Intel Iris Graphics 5100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 5100 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 5100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 51 Watt
| Launch date | 27 May 2013 vs 1 March 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 51 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000
- 4.8x more core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 9.6x more pipelines: 384 vs 40
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1578 vs 738
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 268
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4071 vs 4035
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1631 vs 1019
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1631 vs 1019
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1974 vs 1668
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1974 vs 1668
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 40 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1578 vs 738 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 vs 268 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4071 vs 4035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1631 vs 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1631 vs 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1974 vs 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1974 vs 1668 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 5100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 | NVIDIA Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 738 | 1578 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 385 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4035 | 4071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1019 | 1631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1019 | 1631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1668 | 1974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1668 | 1974 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.332 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 265.424 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.093 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.009 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.219 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2446 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2446 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Graphics 5100 | NVIDIA Quadro K2000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Kepler |
| Code name | Haswell GT3 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2013 | 1 March 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1205 | 1206 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
| Price now | $164.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 40 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 51 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,270 million |
| Floating-point performance | 732.7 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 202 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Graphics 5100 with others
IntelIris Graphics 5100 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6490M
IntelIris Graphics 5100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M
IntelIris Graphics 5100 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000
IntelIris Graphics 5100 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670D
IntelIris Graphics 5100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 830M
IntelIris Graphics 5100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930M
