NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and NVIDIA Quadro 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 86% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 513 MHz
  • Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 30.53 GTexel / s vs 22.57 GTexel / s
  • Around 9% higher pipelines: 384 vs 352
  • Around 1% better floating-point performance: 732.7 gflops vs 722.3 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 3x lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 152 Watt
  • Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
  • Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 406 vs 386
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2646 vs 2602
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3493 vs 3104
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 3316
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2646 vs 2602
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3493 vs 3104
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 3316
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 March 2013 vs 23 February 2011
Core clock speed 954 MHz vs 513 MHz
Texture fill rate 30.53 GTexel / s vs 22.57 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 352
Floating-point performance 732.7 gflops vs 722.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 51 Watt vs 152 Watt
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 406 vs 386
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2646 vs 2602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3493 vs 3104
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3339 vs 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2646 vs 2602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3493 vs 3104
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3339 vs 3316

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000

  • Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 2560 MB vs 2 GB
  • Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1935 vs 1586
  • Around 85% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7349 vs 3973
  • Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 16.451 vs 14.283
  • Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 511.131 vs 386.006
  • Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.925 vs 1.018
  • Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 17.065 vs 15.605
  • Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 46.591 vs 31.155
Specifications (specs)
Maximum memory size 2560 MB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1935 vs 1586
Geekbench - OpenCL 7349 vs 3973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 16.451 vs 14.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 511.131 vs 386.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.925 vs 1.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 17.065 vs 15.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 46.591 vs 31.155

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1586
1935
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
406
386
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3973
7349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14.283
16.451
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
386.006
511.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.018
1.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15.605
17.065
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
31.155
46.591
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2646
2602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3493
3104
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3339
3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2646
2602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3493
3104
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3339
3316
Name NVIDIA Quadro K2000D NVIDIA Quadro 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark 1586 1935
PassMark - G2D Mark 406 386
Geekbench - OpenCL 3973 7349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.283 16.451
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 386.006 511.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.018 1.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.605 17.065
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 31.155 46.591
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2646 2602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3493 3104
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3339 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2646 2602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3493 3104
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3339 3316

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D NVIDIA Quadro 5000

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Fermi
Code name GK107 GF100
Launch date 1 March 2013 23 February 2011
Launch price (MSRP) $599 $2,499
Place in performance rating 977 980
Price now $464 $268
Type Workstation Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 4.14 12.71

Technical info

Core clock speed 954 MHz 513 MHz
Floating-point performance 732.7 gflops 722.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 352
Texture fill rate 30.53 GTexel / s 22.57 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 51 Watt 152 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 3,100 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 202 mm 248 mm
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2560 MB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB / s 120.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 320 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 3000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5