NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2100M and AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.6x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 254 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4566 vs 3977
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.107 vs 0.789
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 19 September 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 254 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4566 vs 3977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.107 vs 0.789 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 667 MHz
- 7.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 32.02 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 2x 960 vs 576
- 4x better floating-point performance: 2x 1,536.0 gflops vs 768.4 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 4200 MHz vs 3008 MHz
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2534 vs 1363
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 373 vs 287
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 667 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 32.02 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 960 vs 576 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,536.0 gflops vs 768.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4200 MHz vs 3008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2534 vs 1363 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 373 vs 287 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1363 | 2534 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 287 | 373 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4566 | 3977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.383 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.892 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.107 | 0.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.761 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3605 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3605 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK106 | Barts |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 19 September 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $84.95 | |
Place in performance rating | 1101 | 741 |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.91 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 768.4 gflops | 2x 1,536.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 576 | 2x 960 |
Texture fill rate | 32.02 GTexel / s | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 254 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2x 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48.0 GB / s | 2x 134.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3008 MHz | 4200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |