NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs ATI FirePro V4800

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2100M and ATI FirePro V4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 32.02 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s
• Around 44% higher pipelines: 576 vs 400
• Around 24% better floating-point performance: 768.4 gflops vs 620.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 69 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1357 vs 1204
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4515 vs 1672
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.383 vs 5.886
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 358.892 vs 321.782
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.107 vs 0.529
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.761 vs 14.184
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2294 vs 1512
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 vs 2211
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 3326
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2294 vs 1512
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 vs 2211
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 3326

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V4800

• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 667 MHz
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 3008 MHz
• Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 282
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 56.777 vs 40.703

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V4800

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1357 1204
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	282 456
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4515 1672
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.383 5.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	358.892 321.782
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.107 0.529
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.761 14.184
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.703 56.777
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2294 1512
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3605 2211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3362 3326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2294 1512
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3605 2211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3362 3326

Compare specifications (specs)