NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs AMD Radeon HD 7850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200M and AMD Radeon HD 7850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 4.2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3696
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3696
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 July 2014 vs 5 March 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3696 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7850
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 55.04 GTexel / s vs 26.68 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,761 gflops vs 853.8 gflops
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3885 vs 3501
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 567 vs 367
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6173 vs 4750
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6173 vs 4750
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3084
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3084
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 55.04 GTexel / s vs 26.68 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 1,761 gflops vs 853.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3885 vs 3501 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 vs 367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6173 vs 4750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6173 vs 4750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3084 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3084 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2200M | AMD Radeon HD 7850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3501 | 3885 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 | 567 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10787 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4750 | 6173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4750 | 6173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3084 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3084 | 3351 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.041 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1028.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.41 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 72.975 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 249.482 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1312 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M | AMD Radeon HD 7850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 19 July 2014 | 5 March 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 549 | 520 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Price now | $449.59 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.01 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 1,761 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 GTexel / s | 55.04 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,800 million |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 1200 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Length | 210 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 153.6 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync |