NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200M and AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4750 vs 2810
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4750 vs 2810
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3264
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3264
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 July 2014 vs 19 November 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 185 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4750 vs 2810 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4750 vs 2810 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3264 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 667 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 93.6 GTexel / s vs 26.68 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 2,995 gflops vs 853.8 gflops
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4470 vs 3469
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 661 vs 384
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3084
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3084
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 667 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 93.6 GTexel / s vs 26.68 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,995 gflops vs 853.8 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4470 vs 3469 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 vs 384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3084 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3084 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2200M | AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3469 | 4470 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 384 | 661 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10787 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4750 | 2810 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4750 | 2810 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3084 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3084 | 3354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.399 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1230.47 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.313 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.519 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 345.793 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1745 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K2200M | AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 19 July 2014 | 19 November 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 544 | 547 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $270 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 2,995 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 26.68 GTexel / s | 93.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 185 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 4,313 million |
| Boost clock speed | 975 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 192.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2200M with others
NVIDIAQuadro K2200M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6500
NVIDIAQuadro K2200M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4830
NVIDIAQuadro K2200M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 XT
NVIDIAQuadro K2200M vs
NVIDIAGRID K280Q
NVIDIAQuadro K2200M vs
NVIDIAGRID K260Q
NVIDIAQuadro K2200M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5200
