NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs AMD Radeon HD 7450A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K3100M and AMD Radeon HD 7450A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 9x more texture fill rate: 45.18 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 768 vs 160
- 5.4x better floating-point performance: 1,084 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 7.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2263 vs 288
- 9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6033 vs 668
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2502 vs 902
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2616 vs 1592
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2502 vs 902
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2616 vs 1592
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 5 January 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 45.18 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 160 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,084 gflops vs 200.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2263 vs 288 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6033 vs 668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2502 vs 902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2616 vs 1592 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2502 vs 902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2616 vs 1592 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7450A
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 324
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 vs 324 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7450A
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K3100M | AMD Radeon HD 7450A |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2263 | 288 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 324 | 385 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6033 | 668 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.239 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 426.305 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.356 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.251 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.135 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3721 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2502 | 902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2616 | 1592 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3721 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2502 | 902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2616 | 1592 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K3100M | AMD Radeon HD 7450A | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GK104 | Caicos |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 5 January 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,999 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1074 | 1076 |
| Price now | $1,999 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.38 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,084 gflops | 200.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 160 |
| Texture fill rate | 45.18 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K3100M with others
NVIDIAQuadro K3100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 440-SE
NVIDIAQuadro K3100M vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9700
NVIDIAQuadro K3100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800 GT
NVIDIAQuadro K3100M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450A
NVIDIAQuadro K3100M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5470
NVIDIAQuadro K3100M vs
AMDFirePro W4190M
