AMD Radeon R7 250E vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 250E and NVIDIA Quadro K3100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250E
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 706 MHz
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 41% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 3200 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.562 vs 19.239
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 582.073 vs 426.305
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.2 vs 1.468
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.669 vs 15.251
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.052 vs 38.135
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 2502
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 2616
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 2502
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 2616
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 20 December 2013 vs 23 July 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 706 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.562 vs 19.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 582.073 vs 426.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.2 vs 1.468 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.669 vs 15.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.052 vs 38.135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 2502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 2616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 2502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 2616 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
- Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 45.18 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- Around 32% better floating-point performance: 1,084 gflops vs 819.2 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3721 vs 2873
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3721 vs 2873
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 45.18 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,084 gflops vs 819.2 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3721 vs 2873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3721 vs 2873 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250E
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 250E | NVIDIA Quadro K3100M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.562 | 19.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 582.073 | 426.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.2 | 1.468 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.669 | 15.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.052 | 38.135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2873 | 3721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 2502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 2616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2873 | 3721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 2502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 2616 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2268 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6010 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 250E | NVIDIA Quadro K3100M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Cape Verde | GK104 |
| Launch date | 20 December 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | $1,999 |
| Place in performance rating | 1075 | 1076 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Price now | $1,999 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.38 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | 1,084 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 768 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | 45.18 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 250E with others
AMDRadeon R7 250E vs
ATIRadeon HD 5470
AMDRadeon R7 250E vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5570
AMDRadeon R7 250E vs
NVIDIAQuadro K3100M
AMDRadeon R7 250E vs
AMDRadeon R9 M275X
AMDRadeon R7 250E vs
AMDFirePro W4190M
AMDRadeon R7 250E vs
AMDRadeon Vega 7
