NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs ATI Radeon HD 5470

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K3100M and ATI Radeon HD 5470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 9% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 8.7x more texture fill rate: 45.18 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
  • 9.6x more pipelines: 768 vs 80
  • 10.4x better floating-point performance: 1,084 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
  • 4x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • 8.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2264 vs 268
  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 324 vs 298
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2502 vs 960
  • Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2616 vs 1771
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2502 vs 960
  • Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2616 vs 1771
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 July 2013 vs 13 February 2012
Core clock speed 706 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate 45.18 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 80
Floating-point performance 1,084 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 3200 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2264 vs 268
PassMark - G2D Mark 324 vs 298
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2502 vs 960
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2616 vs 1771
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2502 vs 960
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2616 vs 1771

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5470

  • 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 19 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5470

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2264
268
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
324
298
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2502
960
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2616
1771
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2502
960
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2616
1771
Name NVIDIA Quadro K3100M ATI Radeon HD 5470
PassMark - G3D Mark 2264 268
PassMark - G2D Mark 324 298
Geekbench - OpenCL 6064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 19.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 426.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.356
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 38.135
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2502 960
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2616 1771
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2502 960
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2616 1771
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M ATI Radeon HD 5470

Essentials

Architecture Kepler TeraScale 2
Code name GK104 Cedar
Launch date 23 July 2013 13 February 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $1,999
Place in performance rating 1074 1075
Price now $1,999
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 1.38

Technical info

Core clock speed 706 MHz 650 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,084 gflops 104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 768 80
Texture fill rate 45.18 GTexel / s 5.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 19 Watt
Transistor count 3,540 million 292 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
Length 170 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 102.4 GB / s 6.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 3200 MHz 800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus