NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs ATI Radeon HD 5470

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K3100M and ATI Radeon HD 5470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

ATI Radeon HD 5470

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 9% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 650 MHz
8.7x more texture fill rate: 45.18 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
9.6x more pipelines: 768 vs 80
10.4x better floating-point performance: 1,084 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
4x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 800 MHz
8.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2264 vs 268
Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 324 vs 298
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2502 vs 960
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2616 vs 1771
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2502 vs 960
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2616 vs 1771

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 July 2013 vs 13 February 2012
Core clock speed	706 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate	45.18 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 80
Floating-point performance	1,084 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed	3200 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2264 vs 268
PassMark - G2D Mark	324 vs 298
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2502 vs 960
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2616 vs 1771
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2502 vs 960
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2616 vs 1771

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5470

3.9x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 75 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	19 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5470

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2264

268

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

324

298

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2502

960

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2616

1771

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2502

960

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2616

1771

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K3100M	ATI Radeon HD 5470
PassMark - G3D Mark	2264	268
PassMark - G2D Mark	324	298
Geekbench - OpenCL	6068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	19.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	426.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.356
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	38.135
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2502	960
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2616	1771
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2502	960
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2616	1771
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K3100M	ATI Radeon HD 5470
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Code name	GK104	Cedar
Launch date	23 July 2013	13 February 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,999
Place in performance rating	1074	1075
Price now	$1,999
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	1.38
Technical info
Core clock speed	706 MHz	650 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,084 gflops	104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	768	80
Texture fill rate	45.18 GTexel / s	5.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	19 Watt
Transistor count	3,540 million	292 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Length		170 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12	11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	102.4 GB / s	6.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	3200 MHz	800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus