NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs AMD FirePro V7900

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4000 and AMD FirePro V7900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 725 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 89% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 151 Watt
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2723 vs 2305
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 417 vs 336
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.437 vs 14.134
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.897 vs 1.309
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 vs 2996
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 vs 2996

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V7900

• Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 58.0 GTexel / s vs 51.84 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
• Around 49% better floating-point performance: 1,856.0 gflops vs 1,244 gflops
• 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27733 vs 6659
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 676.409 vs 427.88
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.678 vs 23.742
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 171.25 vs 61.965
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3651
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3321
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3651
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3321

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V7900

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2723 2305
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	417 336
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6659 27733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.437 14.134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	427.88 676.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.897 1.309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.742 36.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	61.965 171.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3798 2996
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3651 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3321 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3798 2996
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3651 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3321 3354

Compare specifications (specs)