NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4000 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3x more pipelines: 768 vs 2x 128
- Around 62% better floating-point performance: 1,244 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 197 Watt
- 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2722 vs 613
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 421 vs 262
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3321 vs 3238
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 vs 3238
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 18 March 2008 |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 2x 128 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 197 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2722 vs 613 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 421 vs 262 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 vs 3238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 vs 3238 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
- Around 85% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 76.8 billion / sec vs 51.84 GTexel / s
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 810 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 76.8 billion / sec vs 51.84 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2722 | 613 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 421 | 262 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6670 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.462 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 427.88 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.899 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.742 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.965 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 | 3238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 | 3238 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK106 | G92 |
| Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 18 March 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,269 | $599 |
| Place in performance rating | 878 | 881 |
| Price now | $225.65 | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.81 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops | 2x 384.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2x 128 |
| Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s | 76.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 197 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 256 (128 per GPU) | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, HDMIDual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin & 8-pin |
| SLI options | Quad | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 2x 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 134.8 GB / s | 128 (64 per GPU) |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K4000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800 GX2
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 445M
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
AMDRadeon 540
