NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 51.84 GTexel / s vs 45.4 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 768 vs 336
- Around 14% better floating-point performance: 1,244 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 vs 3754
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 vs 3754
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 17 May 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s vs 45.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 336 |
Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 vs 3754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 vs 3754 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2768 vs 2720
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 431 vs 422
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8692 vs 6665
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.82 vs 18.462
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 623.187 vs 427.88
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.201 vs 1.899
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.402 vs 23.742
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2768 vs 2720 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 431 vs 422 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8692 vs 6665 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.82 vs 18.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 623.187 vs 427.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.201 vs 1.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.402 vs 23.742 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.233 vs 61.965 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 vs 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 vs 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 3321 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2720 | 2768 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 | 431 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6665 | 8692 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.462 | 25.82 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 427.88 | 623.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.899 | 2.201 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.742 | 30.402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.965 | 62.233 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 | 3754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 | 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 | 3754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 | 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GK106 | GF114 |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 17 May 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,269 | $199 |
Place in performance rating | 879 | 865 |
Price now | $225.65 | $353.59 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.81 | 10.61 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops | 1,088.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 336 |
Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s | 45.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,950 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 99 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 8.25" (21 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | Two 6-pin |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-Way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 134.8 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |