NVIDIA Quadro K4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 51.84 GTexel / s versus 45.4 GTexel / s
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 336
- Environ 14% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,244 gflops versus 1,088.6 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 88% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 150 Watt
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 3 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5616 MHz versus 4000 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 versus 3754
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 versus 3754
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 March 2013 versus 17 May 2011 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 51.84 GTexel / s versus 45.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 336 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,244 gflops versus 1,088.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5616 MHz versus 4000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 versus 3754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 versus 3754 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2768 versus 2720
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 431 versus 422
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8692 versus 6665
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.82 versus 18.462
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 623.187 versus 427.88
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.201 versus 1.899
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.402 versus 23.742
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2768 versus 2720 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 431 versus 422 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8692 versus 6665 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.82 versus 18.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 623.187 versus 427.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.201 versus 1.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.402 versus 23.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.233 versus 61.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 versus 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 versus 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 3321 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2720 | 2768 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 | 431 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6665 | 8692 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.462 | 25.82 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 427.88 | 623.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.899 | 2.201 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.742 | 30.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.965 | 62.233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 | 3754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 | 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 | 3754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 | 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 | 3332 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK106 | GF114 |
| Date de sortie | 1 March 2013 | 17 May 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,269 | $199 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 879 | 865 |
| Prix maintenant | $225.65 | $353.59 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.81 | 10.61 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,244 gflops | 1,088.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 336 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 51.84 GTexel / s | 45.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 1,950 million |
| Température maximale du GPU | 99 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | 8.25" (21 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | Two 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 2-Way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 3 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 134.8 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5616 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro K4000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7200
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800 GX2
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 445M
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
NVIDIAP106-090
