NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 140 Watt
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• 936x more memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 vs 3581
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 vs 3581

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 51.84 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 960 vs 768
• Around 59% better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 1,244 gflops
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 vs 2721
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 424
• Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 vs 6674
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.505 vs 18.462
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 vs 427.88
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 vs 1.899
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 vs 23.742
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.69 vs 61.965
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 3651
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 3321
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 3651
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 3321
• Around 60% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1307 vs 817

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2721 4017
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	424 487
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6674 11364
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.462 30.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	427.88 705.293
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.899 3.085
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.742 35.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	61.965 62.69
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3798 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3651 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3321 3365
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3798 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3651 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3321 3365
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	817 1307

Compare specifications (specs)