NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs ATI Radeon HD 4250
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4000M and ATI Radeon HD 4250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 601 MHz vs 594 MHz
- 20.2x more texture fill rate: 48.08 GTexel / s vs 2.376 GTexel / s
- 24x more pipelines: 960 vs 40
- 24.3x better floating-point performance: 1,154 gflops vs 47.52 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 792 MHz
- 16.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 123
- 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4470 vs 782
- 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4470 vs 782
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 vs 25 February 2009 |
Core clock speed | 601 MHz vs 594 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 48.08 GTexel / s vs 2.376 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 960 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops vs 47.52 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz vs 792 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 vs 123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4470 vs 782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4470 vs 782 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4250
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 408 vs 301
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 408 vs 301 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4250
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K4000M | ATI Radeon HD 4250 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 | 123 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 | 408 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5986 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.054 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 544.601 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.46 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.553 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3855 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4957 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4470 | 782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3855 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4957 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4470 | 782 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M | ATI Radeon HD 4250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK104 | RV620 |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 | 25 February 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 838 | 839 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 601 MHz | 594 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 47.52 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 960 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 48.08 GTexel / s | 2.376 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB / s | 6.34 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 792 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | yes |
Technologies |
||
HDCP support | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |