AMD Radeon HD 8790M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8790M and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8790M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• Around 41% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 601 MHz
• Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2800 MHz
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 301
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.759 vs 10.054
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.576 vs 1.46
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.839 vs 22.103
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 80.418 vs 36.553

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 48.08 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 960 vs 384
• Around 67% better floating-point performance: 1,154 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 1306
• Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5986 vs 4920
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 544.601 vs 465.631
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3855 vs 2181
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4957 vs 2656
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4470 vs 2014
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3855 vs 2181
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4957 vs 2656
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4470 vs 2014

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8790M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1306 1978
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	751 301
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4920 5986
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.759 10.054
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	465.631 544.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.576 1.46
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.839 22.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	80.418 36.553
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2181 3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2656 4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2014 4470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2181 3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2656 4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2014 4470

Compare specifications (specs)