NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs AMD Radeon HD 7450A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4100M and AMD Radeon HD 7450A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 13.6x more texture fill rate: 67.78 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 7.2x more pipelines: 1152 vs 160
- 8.1x better floating-point performance: 1,627 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 9.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2736 vs 288
- 13.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9097 vs 668
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1974 vs 902
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3246 vs 1592
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1974 vs 902
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3246 vs 1592
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 5 January 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 67.78 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1152 vs 160 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops vs 200.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2736 vs 288 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9097 vs 668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1974 vs 902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3246 vs 1592 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1974 vs 902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3246 vs 1592 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7450A
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 324
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 vs 324 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7450A
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | AMD Radeon HD 7450A |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2736 | 288 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 324 | 385 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9097 | 668 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.487 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.985 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.452 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.984 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1105 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1974 | 902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3246 | 1592 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1105 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1974 | 902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3246 | 1592 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | AMD Radeon HD 7450A | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GK104 | Caicos |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 5 January 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1075 | 1078 |
| Price now | $379.99 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.50 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops | 200.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1152 | 160 |
| Texture fill rate | 67.78 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K4100M with others
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450A
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5470
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5570
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M vs
IntelIris Graphics 6100
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M vs
NVIDIAQuadro M500M
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M vs
IntelUHD Graphics P630
