NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs ATI Radeon HD 5470
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4100M and ATI Radeon HD 5470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 13x more texture fill rate: 67.78 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 14.4x more pipelines: 1152 vs 80
- 15.6x better floating-point performance: 1,627 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 10.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2736 vs 268
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 324 vs 298
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1974 vs 960
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3246 vs 1771
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1974 vs 960
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3246 vs 1771
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 13 February 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 67.78 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1152 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2736 vs 268 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 324 vs 298 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1974 vs 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3246 vs 1771 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1974 vs 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3246 vs 1771 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5470
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 100 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5470
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | ATI Radeon HD 5470 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2736 | 268 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 324 | 298 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9097 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.487 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.985 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.452 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.984 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1105 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1974 | 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3246 | 1771 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1105 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1974 | 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3246 | 1771 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | ATI Radeon HD 5470 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GK104 | Cedar |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 13 February 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1075 | 1077 |
| Price now | $379.99 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.50 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1152 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 67.78 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 19 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K4100M with others
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450A
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5470
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5570
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M vs
IntelIris Graphics 6100
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M vs
NVIDIAQuadro M500M
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M vs
IntelUHD Graphics P630
