NVIDIA Quadro K420 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K420 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K420
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 876 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 14.02 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 740 vs 650
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 283 vs 129
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 186.605 vs 151.304
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 1 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 876 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 14.02 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 740 vs 650 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 vs 129 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 186.605 vs 151.304 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 31% better floating-point performance: 441.6 gflops vs 336.4 gflops
- Around 24% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 41 Watt
- 2048x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB / 2 GB
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3687 vs 1847
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.572 vs 6
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.808 vs 0.433
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.943 vs 10.365
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 39.301 vs 17.75
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1524 vs 1245
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1426 vs 598
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2519 vs 1241
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1524 vs 1245
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1426 vs 598
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2519 vs 1241
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops vs 336.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 41 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB / 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3687 vs 1847 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.572 vs 6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.808 vs 0.433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.943 vs 10.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.301 vs 17.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1524 vs 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1426 vs 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2519 vs 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1524 vs 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1426 vs 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2519 vs 1241 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K420
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K420 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 740 | 650 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 | 129 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1847 | 3687 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6 | 8.572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 186.605 | 151.304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.433 | 0.808 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.365 | 13.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.75 | 39.301 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1245 | 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 598 | 1426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1241 | 2519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1245 | 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 598 | 1426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1241 | 2519 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K420 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | GK107 | GK208 |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $96.67 | |
Place in performance rating | 1457 | 1459 |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.27 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 876 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 336.4 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 14.02 GTexel / s | 9.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Boost clock speed | 889 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DVI-I DP, 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 160 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB / 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | 128 Bit | DDR3 |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |