NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4200 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 771 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 43.9x more texture fill rate: 87.81 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s
- 33.6x more pipelines: 1344 vs 40
- 52.7x better floating-point performance: 2,107 gflops vs 40 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 6.8x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 47.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4334 vs 91
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 500 vs 247
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 7 January 2008 |
Core clock speed | 771 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 87.81 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,107 gflops vs 40 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4334 vs 91 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 500 vs 247 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450
- 9x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 108 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 108 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4334 | 91 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 500 | 247 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12321 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.016 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.063 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.73 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.588 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.194 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6373 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3382 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6373 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3382 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3311 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK104 | M82 |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 7 January 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $854.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 699 | 691 |
Price now | $446.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 784 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,107 gflops | 40 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 87.81 GTexel / s | 2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt | 12 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 172.8 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 / GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Powerplay |